By Terry Howell
Many of my recent articles have been about the Post 9/11 GI Bill. I have covered both the pros and cons of this new education benefit. The more significant issues with the new GI Bill are that online students are excluded from receiving the “living stipend” and the tuition payment rate is set too low to cover the full cost of online education.
I have also noted in my blog that we can expect congress to tweak the law after the first of the year. It is assumed that the changes will include an amendment to include “distance learning” (online education) programs in the eligibility for the “living stipend” and/or create a higher tuition payment rate for the more expensive private schools and online programs.
Word is that they are considering opening the stipend to online students, but there is no talk of increasing the tuition rate to cover the more expensive online course work. Unfortunately those involved in the current discussions don't see the value of online education.
Based on my discussions with key individuals, it seems many of our elected officials and representatives on the Veterans Advisory Committee on Education want to apply a 1944 academic approach in today’s education environment. Apparently they assume that today’s service members all want (or are able) to go back to school and enjoy the lecture hall experience.
They couldn’t be more wrong, in fact, a recent Associated Press article, Soldiers, Vets Turning to Online Education, addresses the popularity of online education among military students (active duty, reserve, and veterans). The article explains how online education gives service members and veterans - especially those dealing with PTSD, or physical disabilities - a way to earn their degree in a more comfortable, self-paced, less public environment.
Another point that seems to escape the decision makers is that nearly all current service members are being brought into the world of education through "non-traditional" education. The Defense Activity for Non-Traditional Education Support (DANTES) makes it possible for military students to use a mix of online, Credit-by-Exam (CLEP/DSST Exams) and ACE credits (college credit for military experience and training) to work toward their degrees. The same AP article quotes the assistant vice president for lifelong learning at the American Council on Education (ACE), Jim Selbe, as saying that “about 50 percent of active duty service members receiving tuition reimbursement from the Department of Defense are taking online courses.”
These programs are a great way for servicemembers to get a head-start on their education goals. However, the new Post 9/11 GI Bill does the exact opposite. It not only penalizes veterans who want to go online, it encourages them to attend “public” universities; many of which will not recognize their ACE credits and/or CLEP and DSST exams.
Time to Step Up
In my opinion it's time for those of us who want the Post 9/11 GI Bill to serve all our veterans to step up and be heard. The responsible committees are already meeting to plan their strategies for fixing the Post 9/11 GI Bill. Some of their ideas include doing away with the Montgomery GI Bill. This may be the right approach, but if they do not make the Post 9/11 GI Bill more useful to the non-classroom bound veterans, it will be a huge mistake and hurt more veterans than it will serve.
If you want to reach out to your elected officials, I suggest you visit our the Military.com Legislative Center, locate your officials and send them both an e-mail and a hard-copy letter asking them to expand the Post 9/11 GI Bill to better serve veterans who are unable to go back to the classroom.
About the Author: A Retired Coast Guard Chief Petty Officer, Terry completed his BS in Management and Communications using a combination of CLEP exams, credit for military service, and distance learning while on active-duty. Terry now serves as Managing Editor for the Education Channel at Military.com.
Recent Comments